Close

April 6, 2012

How Out Are You?

Today I stumbled upon a great blog post by Steve Pavlina titled Why Are You Hiding? It immediately resonated with me. One of my own personal development objectives is to be the authentic me as much as possible in everything that I do. Do I always succeed? No. But clearly Steve Pavlina has a similar perspective and I think you’ll find his post, and his entire blog, quite interesting.

Reading the post made me wonder how others in the alternative sexuality and relationship networks feel about being entirely out. By no means am I a Pollyanna about this subject. I know there can be some legitimate reasons why people stay closeted about their nontraditional sexuality or relationships. But even when there might be legitimate reasons, I contend there are still consequences to remaining closeted. It’s a constant balance between the freedom and liberation being out brings with it and the potential consequences and repercussions such openness might engender.

In a now famous speech, Guy Baldwin suggested that members of the leather/kink community who are known by scene names (names other than their daily real names) may not be as well positioned to represent the leather/BDSM/kink/fetish among us as might those who use their real names. I’m still wrestling with how I feel about that, but I do think the topic is worth discussing. If a titleholder isn’t using their real name, can they properly represent their title? If a member of a leather/BDSM/kink club or organization works with their local or state officials on issues of concern to the kinky among us, can they do that effectively if they are essentially closeted in some way?

I don’t pretend to know the answers for sure. While it’s easy for me to say that being entirely out is always the best option, I know others will give me good reasons not to be. But if we liken the furthering of rights and acceptance for kinky people or those who choose nontraditional relationship configurations to the early gay and lesbian rights movement, it was those who chose to “come out” and be identified who ended up making the most difference. It was a brave stance, but coming out ended up being generally acknowledged in the LGBT community as being the most effective way to further the rights and acceptance they deserve.

What are your thoughts? Should the kinky among us be more out? Can closeted kinksters and polyamorists adequately serve the needs of those communities? I’d love to hear what you have to say about this. I think it’s a discussion worth having.

10 Comments on “How Out Are You?

Allena Gabosch
April 6, 2012 at 7:13 pm

I agree. I’m of the belief that if you are a leader or a title holder that you should be able to use your real name if necessary (such as being on an organizations board). I know that it’s not always safe (ie: if you’ve got kids), however for the most part the consequences of being outed are minor and more a figment of imaginations and for those who want to stay “outlaws”. I have been out from the beginning. My name is googleble (is that a word) and I’ve suffered no ill effects from being out. Now of course I’m employed by our community (Executive Director of the Center for Sex Positive Culture). However, I was appointed to a city government position (the LGBT Commission in Seattle) and was out about my life and employment. The city council still appointed me .

Also, if someone can be safely out and does so, it makes it easier for others to come out. There really is something to be said to putting a face of “normalcy” to those of us in the Leather/Kink Communities. The more we are open about our lives, the more accessible we are to those who are still deep in the closet. Many of our brothers and sisters are just waiting for permission to be the kinky, sexual beings that they already are. Let’s make it as easy for them as possible.

Thanks!

Race Bannon
April 6, 2012 at 7:24 pm

Allena, I agree. And you are one of those community folks we all look up to. Keep up the good work!

Lily Lloyd
April 6, 2012 at 8:08 pm

I’m sort of slowly transitioning. I started writing on Fetlife under a pen name, then moved my stuff out onto the open internet. Problem being, one of my partners would suffer significant harm from being outed, and I don’t want that to happen to her.

I blog about sex, and I can’t really write about my own sex life without writing about their sex lives too, and their consent matters to me. I think if I chose to take a leadership position where I used my own name, I’d probably either have to stop writing or wait until my partners felt safe. Writing about sex means so much to me that I’d hate to stop.

Lily Lloyd
April 6, 2012 at 8:10 pm

(My comment would probably make a lot more sense if the sentence “So I still blog under a pseudonym” were appended to the first paragraph).

Race Bannon
April 6, 2012 at 8:39 pm

Lily, since our scene rightfully embraces consent as a central tenet, your situation makes total sense.

Alan Arthur Chiras
April 7, 2012 at 5:26 am

I have an opinion. When I ran Leather Force 2000, I was determined to be as open as possible about my work. I used my real name on everything I did. I’m glad I did it!

Patrick Mulcahey
April 9, 2012 at 9:31 am

As a fallen-away Catholic (though “disgusted,” “infuriated,” “mutinous” might all be more accurate terms), one of the many New Testament injunctions I still very much believe is that we all have a responsibility to “walk in the light”: to allow ourselves to be seen and known, to tell the truth about our lives, to live in a manner we need never be ashamed of. I aspire to do that.

I don’t believe the exhortation can ever be absolute. Everyone’s appearance is a kind of lie, since even you, Race Bannon, cannot convey in your appearance exactly who you are to everyone who sees you. (But you come closer than just about anyone I have ever known.) It’s a goal we can only hope to approach, yes with due appreciation for our safety and the safety of those around us, but pushing ourselves a little out of what used to feel comfortable, learning to eschew what used to seem little white lies in favor of what we know is true.

Some degree of privilege helps. Being a white guy no longer career-building but somewhat established and comfortable gives me a safety that a younger or female or trans person of color living in a more repressive culture would not have. Expectations must be adjusted accordingly.

But mostly I think we find what Allena (hello, Allena) has said: that the consequences of being out are much less dire than we used to imagine. I am sure there are people who regret coming out, or being outed forcibly and unexpectedly — but I have never met one.

Race Bannon
April 9, 2012 at 9:59 am

Patrick, I like that phrase, “walk in the light.” Seems to sum it up beautifully.

Stella Omega
May 1, 2012 at 10:06 pm

The issue of pseudonymity is a matter of perennial debate. I see this same discussion in so many communities: genre writers, bloggers, scenesters. Invariably it divides along the several lines: older folks who did not grow up on the internet versus the middle-aged who had caution instilled in them as young-adult users versus really young people who are less wary of privacy concerns– although that’s changing mighty quickly, and I see more youngsters employing pseuds these past few years.

The other divide is men, who by and large do not feel vulnerable to stalking and death threats, threats against offspring, or slut shaming– versus women who mostly do feel vulnerable to these things. Myself, I came into the scene during the height of the Anderson School witch-hunt. At that time the practice was to take the kids away first, then try to prove the allegations. This atmosphere instilled a hella lot of caution in me.

I use this name everywhere except work and officialdom. It’s more recognisable to me– and to others– than my “real” name. Every once in a while, I think about bringing my “real” name into the scene, since in fact it’s far more appropriate to a genderqueer than the ultra-feminine name I saddled myself with, but– Stella I am.

John D
July 16, 2012 at 12:13 am

I have very mixed feelings about this. I try to live openly and proud of all I am. But being out about kink is different than being out about gay; gay is a protected status and being kinky is not (you cannot legally be fired, lose your housing, lose parental rights, etc. for being gay, if it happens you can probably sue; no such protection for coming out as kinky). So being out as kinky is a privilege which many people may not be able to afford. Do we want all our leaders to be economically or socially privileged? Do we want to shame those who cannot do it to either staying away from any community leadership, or put into the awkward position of explaining why their case is special (involves partners or children or intolerant employers)?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.